Laura ([info]guingel) wrote,
  • Mood: thoughtful

About feminism more than comics - but I need concrete examples, I can't think in the abstract

If you're wondering where I've been - which you probably haven't because I regularly don't update for a little while and am really a sporadic commenter these days - I've been reading feminist writing, largely about comic books. (Which reminds me, I owe [info]snortney08 a facebook reply.) (Also, note new ass-kicking, fishnet-free Black Canary icon.)

So I think I'm pre-menstrual and this makes me feel terrible about myself as a human being (I pushed a woman on the subway and she was snarky about it, and I left work a couple minutes early - and this guy commented on it) and also just gives me a feeling of. . . the opposite of "we're all in this together" - an automatic assumption that people don't like each other, an overall negativity. . . um, yeah, this is what happens to me, rather than anger and short-tempered violence. That's my default state, I think I get too weary for it when hormones are playing wacky. Anyway, so there's already that going on, and reading this stuff is a bit depressing.

But less depressing than it has been in the past, because I've been reading Girls Read Comics And They're Pissed by Karen Healey and she's really incredibly articulate and really says a lot of what I want to say but can't figure out, in a really effective manner. Well, it's convincing to me, although I already agree with her. This bingo card of common anti-comics-feminist arguments is incredibly, incredibly helpful. What I do think, though, is that a lot of the discussions I've seen don't realize the basic missing assumptions on the part of their opponents (there's also a LOT of defensiveness, which I understand). I actually made a list of things you need to make sure everyone is on the same page about before you can launch into a discussion of these issues. While I was cooking dinner last night, on a bit of scrap paper in the kitchen. XD
-Objectification of women exists
-This is bad - it has negative consequences
-Portraying women as sexualized objects in the media exists, and is common in comic books
-This leads to consumers of these media viewing women as sexual objects and is therefore harmful

OK, they're a little repetitive and need some refining. But really, these are not shared conceptions, and no matter how much you argue that a figurine is degrading to women, someone is never going to understand that until he or she accepts the above assumptions.

A couple shockingly obvious examples that this is occurring:
Frank Miller's portrayal of Vicki Vale and also EVERYTHING ELSE HE DOES and every single woman in All Star Batman. This is where I got the rage going, although mostly throughout this foray I was depressed and also thoughtful and enlightened. I'm not linking to some of the articles about him because they're too upsetting.
Sinister subtleties of posing - a sly one. . . I would never have thought to notice this, but once she points it out, it's so fucking obvious.

Another interesting link is an excellent and thoughtful response to Joe Quesada's explanation of why there aren't many women working in comics. He's the editor-in-chief of Marvel but of course he denies all responsibility. The article generally points out some really interesting, and sad, and. . . important, I think is the word, things about women in creative fields in general.

THIS IS EXCELLENT AND NOT COMIC BOOK RELATED. It's an exploration of how a privileged person should behave when issues of privilege are being discussed. It's an excellent, excellent resource. I know several white males who need to read it, and being straight and white and wealthy and educated, I have my own share of privileged positions and felt I benefited from reading as well.

Further excellent non-comics discussion of patriarchy. This is basically everything you've always wanted to articulate but never been able to. It was in response to a movement at a Con where women could put on buttons saying it was okay to grope their breasts. It was defended at length as a way to show appreciation of women's bodies in a safe way and therefore increase their self-esteem. The article in question doesn't deal with the initial issue but with some of the responses to it. It answered questions that I'd had for a while and is so very much worth reading. I wish I could memorize it.

One of the main things I'm coming away with is that women are viewed as being bodies, sexual bodies. It's certainly not an all-the-time thing, but it's the default public interaction between genders.

Anyway, I will conclude with a couple links that are, actually, genuinely hilariously funny. SO FUNNY! But also sad, because they're true. But also funny!
If men were sexualized the same as women on comic book covers. AWESOME. Oh, Superman, you minx. (Two notes: (1) women are usually not sexualized quite so blatantly - this is a Frank Miller All Star Batman issue again. (2) even if DC was gonna publish comics with covers like these, it wouldn't be the same because there isn't the history - see the springheel-jack article linked to directly above.)
Reasons to put women into your fiction. Written by a dude! All ironic-like and terribly clever. I quote: Now before you scoff; "Pshaw, what could a woman have to do with matters of import?" let me bamboozle you with a few left-field ideas I've picked up from some of the writers around the world.


I will say that this is actually steering me back towards Johnny's a little bit - Katie sent me an old picture of Sakamoto that reminded me of one of the very first things that attracted me to the fandom: the gender reversal. Japan's got problems, but if you look at them sort of in a vacuum, not interacting with or talking about women, it's kind of awesomely challenging to the way gender roles usually play out in the media. The boys are so clearly intended to be viewed, intended to be the objects of female desire. Maybe it's the yaoi thing, but they're allowed to be sexy in a non-aggressive way. It feels really, really good to see that after reading this stuff. The male sexuality used to pander towards women.

I know, this entry will come across differently to non-comics fans because you already don't like the industry, or maybe already hate it for being so sexist. Obviously this is one of the most negative angles from which it can be approached. But I really do think the ideas can be applied to portrayals of women in the media in general, for the most part. They're just really good, concrete examples that are beautifully articulated and explored and argued. I definitely recommend checking out some of the links, even though I'm not quite sure what you'll take away.

And now I'm going to sleep because lack thereof has been making me sickly this week.

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 8 comments

[info]karanguni

March 18 2009, 04:21:03 UTC 3 years ago

*claps!* I'm too braindead to really say anything more than I agree with a whole boatload of what you (and your linked articles) said here. :D Heh, the one with the fake Male Sexualisation was aslkfjsklaj so awesome. Comics!genre, oh how I love and loathe you.

[info]guingel

March 18 2009, 13:00:43 UTC 3 years ago Edited:  March 18 2009, 13:10:22 UTC

Yeah, comics fandom and the comics industry have some really amazing people, and some really shitty people. And! If you wanted to know why I'm so angry (in a non-feminist way, although also a feminist way) about the directions DC has taken recently, the amazingly awesome Occasional Superheroine articulates it perfectly. (You should also seriously, seriously read her Goodbye to Comics, it is heartwrenching. And provides, you know, more dimension to the article responding to Joe Quesada - women don't want to join the comic book industry because they are treated poorly.)

(Some reactions to Goodbye to Comics, for after you've read it - Gail Simone's comment was really helpful for some perspective. The actual comments to the article are annoying though, one troll went rampant. A lot of guys like that out there. ::sigh::)

[info]ohmiya_sg

March 18 2009, 05:42:36 UTC 3 years ago

Oooh. That how to act when privileged article is really interesting, and I allowed myself to get pulled in when I need to write a paper. XD I'll have to come back and finish it later (and check out a few more of your links) when I have time.

[info]guingel

March 18 2009, 13:36:09 UTC 3 years ago

That article felt really justifying to me, because I've tried to say as much previously - often men don't understand that they really just don't know how it feels.

FYI, the "reasons to put women in your fiction" link is also not comics-related.

Good luck with all your work and finals and biochem!

[info]ohmiya_sg

March 18 2009, 18:33:23 UTC 3 years ago

I was actually reading the article from the opposite perspective, where I'm the privileged one. I didn't really know who was writing it until the end.

I read that one. Satire is fun stuff. XD

Thanks!

[info]guingel

March 18 2009, 20:29:07 UTC 3 years ago

I also read it as the privileged one, even though I was linked to it from a feminist article - it might be the only way to read it. But most of the people I know who NEED to read it are men.

[info]snortney08

March 20 2009, 20:47:09 UTC 3 years ago

heyo!

I've been meaning to post on this all week! It's been hectic at work...but now that it's Friday right before the whistle blows...I'm slackin off! It's a lame response to a lot of well thought out commentary on your part...but here goes.

Oh man...as soon as I saw this post I was all over it! I mean I always read your posts...but half the time I'm like...oh city government and boy bands..i have nothing to say. haha. not that i have profound things to contribute to this...but i did want to say your links are so interesting! this is why i love studying women and gender studies! it's all about understanding privilege and finding constructive ways to create dialogue about it. I think everyone should read the privilege link..no matter who you are. There are so many diverse forms of oppression that it's necessary for everyone to be sensative to people's needs. It's hard to do..often exhausting, but when you're the one with the privilege, it's your responsibility to be aware of that and be respectful to others you know. i can assure you it's more exhausting to be oppressed...so people should shut their pie holes about "being PC takes so much work blah blah" okay...i'm off of the box...sorta haha. anyways it would make society a lot more respectful and possibly friendly..in my humble opinion..if people just stepped outside of themselves. Comic books are super genderized! I mean, so is all of popular culture, but there is something extreme about comic books. It's really interesting.. and now that graphic novels are making a move onto the nytimes best seller list and are being taught in lit classes...it's cool that comic book theory and graphic novel theory are being taught in classrooms. i mean..the only way to transform a genre is from the inside out...and i hope this Quesada dude realizes his sexist ways...it's a long road ahead obvi. so yea...this crap pisses me off all of the time. but that's why i love studying it..b/c it's personal. and the personal is political, mi amiga! i will call you soon and we can chizzat about feminism/comic books very sooon. until then...excellent work on the feminist front, dude! i'm so proud *tear. also can i just say that i love how your lj posts read like academic essays..they're so well thought out and structured! your writing formula is sexy! lol
<3

[info]guingel

March 23 2009, 16:12:45 UTC 3 years ago Edited:  March 23 2009, 18:04:53 UTC

Re: heyo!

people should shut their pie holes about "being PC takes so much work blah blah"

This drives me so crazy. I hate when people just write off what feminists or other activists are saying and fighting for by just going "oh, you take things too seriously." No, YOU take things too lightly! What we say and how we say it is important!

You would have a better idea of this, but it seems like there's not a good identification of concrete problems in feminism - or different branches see different problems. Or problems are identified, but they're not the actual root problems. Like people will say, "It's bad that you call women 'chicks'," which misses the point that "If you use disrespectful and belittling terminology, you will belittle that which you are referring to," or even more precisely, "The words that you use affect the way you think."

That's just one example, but I don't know. . . things just seem really disjointed. It's kind of what lead me to list those starting assumptions above. A lot of these ideas can be really, really difficult to grasp for people who aren't thinking about these things or aware of them. Sometimes they're hard for me to grasp, so to a man who isn't experiencing them it can seem really "airy fairy" and it's important that people are able to identify the ideas behind the ideas - the actual, physical, lived negatives that are the results of these actions, whether they be small or large.

Also there are different goals, different ideals that people are reaching for - and people don't even seem to realize that all the time. I think the basic split is kind of like the affirmative action discussion - women who are insulted by some types of feminism - who are like "women can take care of this themselves" and then women who see the need for sort of mandated change. I dont' know. . .

These are all just sort of vague impressions, so I could be proven wrong, but that's how things come across to me.


EDIT: Inherent differences between the genders! That's kind of the main thing I was trying to get at. Should we assume that men and women start out pretty much the same but are heavily indoctrinated with gendered behavior starting literally from birth? I think even if there are inherent differences (and of course, biology will result in differences - more testosterone does mean more aggression, I assume) there's so much gender indoctrination that the vast majority of gendered behavior can be assumed to be the results of these - particularly when it comes to tastes. Other feminists seem not to think this, which leads to a conflict between asserting the basic sameness, and highlighting and celebrating the differences of woman.

Actually, even though I very firmly am on the "gender differences are learned" side, I feel that conflict within myself - I think probably most do. I want women to be portrayed in non-stereotypical ways. I want them to be tough, I want them to be in male-dominated professions, I want them to basically not be gendered, not defined by their womanhood in any way. But I also want traditional womanhood portrayed positively - like the assertion that becoming a housewife isn't "not working" or wasting your life but is a valid choice. Because that still is Woman, now, and two aspects of the battle against sexism are 1) demonstrating that Woman as she is not is in now way inferior and 2) demonstrating that Woman is equal to Man, that she isn't bound by gender constraints (as neither should Man be), that - to put it simply - people are people.
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…